Jcruz87
Member
I think at the end of the day it's completely subjective either way, and completely based on preference. I don't think either owner is going to have regret for their decision
Sponsored
LOL really?? You know for $100-$200 you can cut off 1 of the resonators and boom... Same sound! I don't think that's a legitimate debate. Looks are subjective and in a straight line race supposidly the Type S will maybe have 1/4 car length in a quarter mile.. Again, who cares?The sound alone makes ITS worth it.
GT3 touring vs GT3, both incredible cars, and at msrp its worth it.
i feel many who paid exaggerated CTR prices need to justify their premium
This comment suggest you've try to get an FL5, but failed. You'll probably say something like, you never wanted an FL5 cause it looks like a Civic. But isn't the Integrabased on a Civic? If yes, isn't it worst to take a Civic and repackage into an Integra? So did you not just paid extra for repackaged "Civic"?!?!? You sound a bit butt hurtThe sound alone makes ITS worth it.
GT3 touring vs GT3, both incredible cars, and at msrp its worth it.
i feel many who paid exaggerated CTR prices need to justify their premium
Sounds like you wanted a CTR, but because you're in Canada and couldn't get one, you're now rationalizing the ITS. Whatever works for you man! I'm laughing at the "North America only" exclusivity of the ITSType S is worth the premium. It looks more special, sounds more special. North America only. Its faster than type R. The Type R looks like another civic with the wing.
This comment suggest you've try to get an FL5, but failed. You'll probably say something like, you never wanted an FL5 cause it looks like a Civic. But isn't the Integrabased on a Civic? If yes, isn't it worst to take a Civic and repackage into an Integra? So did you not just paid extra for repackaged "Civic"?!?!? You sound a bit butt hurtwith that justify premium comment.
Oh yeah, you're right.. It all makes sense now lolThis comment suggest you've try to get an FL5, but failed. You'll probably say something like, you never wanted an FL5 cause it looks like a Civic. But isn't the Integrabased on a Civic? If yes, isn't it worst to take a Civic and repackage into an Integra? So did you not just paid extra for repackaged "Civic"?!?!? You sound a bit butt hurtwith that justify premium comment.
Thanks for assuming, but I guess it is the internet. Actually I’m second in line guaranteed one at a large Canadian dealer, just ironic that I get to enjoy both as my ITS came one of the first in Cana I still plan on keeping the CTR and objectively trying it out. Just grateful my ITS came first as otherwise I may not have even cared for giving it a try.Sounds like you wanted a CTR, but because you're in Canada and couldn't get one, you're now rationalizing the ITS. Whatever works for you man! I'm laughing at the "North America only" exclusivity of the ITS![]()
Agree about the top part. Objectively correct. Subjective taste.I understand this is just your opinion but I need to remind you that the Civic Type R is a Civic and they put a wing, made it wider and a long list of other additional parts and aspects.
The Integra Type S is an Integra with tacked on fenders... made it wider and a long list of other additional parts and aspects.
I feel you felt the need to justify buying an ITS with its price premium
Nah, it's not the Internet, it's from your own posts. I drove the ITS twice, at two different dealers. I was left underwhelmed TBH and posted my thoughts, as did others. I'm sure for some it's a nice car, but to me it looked cheap and not special at all.Thanks for assuming, but I guess it is the internet. Actually I’m second in line guaranteed one at a large Canadian dealer, just ironic that I get to enjoy both as my ITS came one of the first in Cana I still plan on keeping the CTR and objectively trying it out. Just grateful my ITS came first as otherwise I may not have even cared for giving it a try.
But I am certain both are engaging and ridiculously incredible cars. When someone makes a thread just hyping one side its just humorous.
The OP was quite respectful unlike yourself, and I never bashed the CTR.Nah, it's not the Internet, it's from your own posts. I drove the ITS twice, at two different dealers. I was left underwhelmed TBH and posted my thoughts, as did others. I'm sure for some it's a nice car, but to me it looked cheap and not special at all.
If you want to bash the CTR, as you did in this thread, then you won't be taken too seriously. So there's that. This thread is not about "hyping" one car if you read it properly. The OP was unimpressed with the ITS, as was I, and loved the CTR. The title was made in jest. He posted his impressions pretty thoroughly, as did other members in other threads, including myself. You however didn't, so if anyone is guilty of "hype" it's you.
Also, to own both cars doesn't make much sense, but people do what people do...Sucks to be in Canada.
Replacing this for my priorAgree about the top part. Objectively correct. Subjective taste.
The issue on this thread is CTR has been out for a year and people have had their cars, not many have at this point received or even tried the ITS to know.
the ITS wouldve been cheaper than CTR after premiums, so no. I am getting both at MSRP
Well saidNah, it's not the Internet, it's from your own posts. I drove the ITS twice, at two different dealers. I was left underwhelmed TBH and posted my thoughts, as did others. I'm sure for some it's a nice car, but to me it looked cheap and not special at all.
If you want to bash the CTR, as you did in this thread, then you won't be taken too seriously. So there's that. This thread is not about "hyping" one car if you read it properly. The OP was unimpressed with the ITS, as was I, and loved the CTR. The title was made in jest. He posted his impressions pretty thoroughly, as did other members in other threads, including myself. You however didn't, so if anyone is guilty of "hype" it's you.
Also, to own both cars doesn't make much sense, but people do what people do...Sucks to be in Canada.